Q: Can you share an example of positive organizational scholarship in action?
A: After the terrorist attacks on September 11, airlines were affected in a massive way. Not only did it cancel travel for a period, but it also made a lot of people wary to travel again.
Airlines saw this coming and immediately laid off tons of people. Southwest Airlines, on the other hand, stated they were not going to lay off anybody, which was a huge risk. They kept people that didn’t work for a while. But because of that, they were the first airline to return to pre-9/11 revenue. They made it back faster than any other competitor.
For me, this has always been a great example of what happens when you put people first. In positive organizational scholarship we take a step back from focusing solely on the numbers and we realize that our actions and communication have a tangible effect on people. So when we say we will sacrifice revenue for our employees, they work harder and care more. When we are honest and create opportunities for people, they rise to the challenge.
Q: Does something different happen in the brain when we learn something through positive reinforcement versus negative reinforcement?
A: There is neuroscience behind it. There’s another great researcher out there, his name is Shawn Achor, he wrote a book called “The Happiness Advantage” and he presents some research on mirror neurons, which posits that the experiences we have, the way people interact with us, is what we mirror back to them.
So, if somebody comes in and they’re really upset, it’s hard for us not to respond in kind. Your brain is just mirroring what you’re seeing. When we talk about leading with positivity, or positive organizational leadership, we’re trying to lead the way we would want to be led.
Q: Can you explain the power of positive versus negative feedback?
A: There are several pieces of research showing that for every one negative thing you say, it takes five positives to balance it out. I think the principle there is sometimes misconstrued, because people think, “Oh, that means I need to say five positive things all the time so I can say my negative things.”
I think the better principle is the power of the negative.
If I give a critique, I need to understand there will be staying power with that. So, I don’t want to say something negative off the cuff. I don’t want to say it in anger. I want to be intentional with the critique I give, and I want to lead in positivity. When I give that critical feedback, I have to understand its power. I also have to spend time supporting people to work through any feedback I give.